Why OneRubric
Feedback you can act on — and defend.
Most institutions already collect course feedback. It arrives in inconsistent forms, stays anonymous to no one in particular, and dies in a spreadsheet nobody reads. When an accreditation review comes, the evidence has to be reconstructed by hand.
The problem
Inconsistent in, unusable out.
Not standardised
Every department asks different questions, so nothing is comparable across faculty, programme, or period.
Not trusted
Without guaranteed anonymity, students self-censor and faculty distrust the result.
Not actionable
A PDF of averages is not a plan. Nothing verifies whether anything improved.
The approach
A standard, run end to end, set up for you.
One rubric across every course makes results comparable and defensible. Guaranteed anonymity makes them honest. A closed loop — insight, action, verification — makes them accountable.
And because we provision and operate every institution ourselves, the standard is configured correctly before anyone logs in — no IT project, no half-finished rollout.
Founding institutions
Honest about where we are.
We're onboarding a small cohort of founding institutions. Direct access to the team, influence over the roadmap, concierge setup. We'd rather have a few institutions running the standard well than a logo wall — so the pricing, support, and roadmap reflect that.