Accreditation
Evidence that's ready before the review is.
Because every course is scored on the same instrument, the evidence a review body asks for already exists — comparable, time-stamped, and exportable. No reconstruction by hand.
What it produces
The artefacts reviewers ask for.
- Period-over-period results by course, faculty, and programme
- Standardised criteria mapped consistently across the institution
- Action plans with owners, timelines, and verified outcomes
- Anonymised response evidence with cohort thresholds
- PDF and CSV export, per programme or institution-wide
- An audit trail from concern to verified resolution
Frameworks
Structured for your review body.
Ghana — GTEC · NAB
Evidence organised to support GTEC / NAB institutional and programme review.
Nigeria — NUC
Programme-level evidence aligned to NUC accreditation expectations.
Regional / international
CHEA-style and regional quality-assurance frameworks — comparable evidence, your taxonomy.
Mappings are configured with your quality directorate during onboarding to match how your institution reports.