Institutions
Built for the institutions that answer for teaching quality.
We're pre-launch and we won't pretend otherwise — no borrowed logos, no invented numbers. Here is exactly who OneRubric is for, what a deployment looks like, and how to be among the first.
Who it's for
One standard, four stakeholders.
Quality assurance & VC-Academic
Defensible, period-over-period evidence for accreditation — without chasing departments for spreadsheets.
Registrar & operations
One instrument across every campus and programme. Rosters sync; periods run themselves.
Faculty
A private, fair coaching note from their own evaluations — never a surveillance tool.
IT & data protection
SSO/SAML they already run, anonymity enforced in the model, data export and clear retention.
What a deployment looks like
Illustrative of the model — not a customer claim.
This is what the standard is designed to produce, described as the mechanism. Real outcomes will be published, with attribution, only when institutions choose to share them.
Period 1 — baseline
Every course scored on the same rubric. Comparable from day one; anonymity enforced.
Mid-period — insight
Plain-language read of what changed and where the risk is; concerns become owned action plans.
Period 2 — verified
The plan is checked against the next period's data. Improvement is measured; evidence retained for audit.
Accreditation context
Structured for your review body.
- Ghana — GTEC · NAB institutional & programme review
- Nigeria — NUC programme accreditation evidence
- Regional / CHEA-style quality-assurance frameworks
Founding cohort
Be among the first.
Founding institutions get direct access to the team, influence over the roadmap, and concierge setup. We onboard a small number at a time so each one runs the standard well.